News

September 2010 Scientist of the Month: Jameela Jafri

by Heather King

Jameela Jafri has just spotted a red-tailed hawk, calls out to the group, and raises her arms in triumph over her head.  “There it is!”  she shouts, and we all look into the sky to see the majestic bird of prey ride the thermals above us.  The ‘we’ is myself, Jameela, two other educators, and nine high school girls from Chicago’s inner city.  We are in Yellowstone National Park for the week, participating in the All Girls’ Expedition, a yearly program run by Project Exploration (PE), a non-profit organization dedicated to science education and outreach in the Chicago area.

Jameela has coordinated girls’ programs at PE since 2007, but her interest in science and science education began much earlier.   Her father, a medical technologist, and her mother, a math teacher, came to New York from Karachi, Pakistan in the 1970s and brought with them their passion for the natural world.  They passed this knowledge and passion on to Jameela and her sisters by taking them on camping and fishing trips while the girls were growing up.

Jameela felt as a child that she was meant to be a part of science, but didn’t do well on tests and was weeded out of science honors classes in middle school.  She also struggled with her identity as a first-generation American and a woman of color.  “I really needed encouragement, and someone to believe in me,” Jameela said of her middle school days.  She got that encouragement while enrolled in high school at the Masters School in Dobbs Ferry, NY.  The most influential experiences Jameela had were outside of the classroom, and included school camping trips and birding expeditions.  These experiences with her high school teachers reinforced her passion and curiosity for the natural world and inspired her to share that passion through education.

In 1997, Jameela graduated with a Batchelor’s degree in Biology and a minor in Anthropology from Barnard College (Columbia University), and in 1999 with a Master’s degree in secondary science education from Teachers College (Columbia University).  She taught science at several high schools, including the Masters School, where she created curriculum that is still being used today.  “It was such a privilege to give back to a place that had given so much to me,” said Jameela of her time teaching at the Masters School.

After teaching science in the United States for several years, Jameela lived in Damascus, Syria for sixteen months to accomplish a life-long dream of learning Arabic.  While there, she met educators and informally spoke with them about how science is taught in Syria.

In 2007, she returned to the United States and moved to Chicago, where she began working for Project Exploration.  Project Exploration was founded in 2000 by University of Chicago paleontologist Paul Sereno and his wife, educator Gabrielle Lyon.  The mission statement of the organization is “to ensure that communities traditionally overlooked by science, such as minority youth and girls, have access to personalized experiences with scientists.”  PE acts as a bridge between local scientists and Chicago youth through after-school programs.  Scientists volunteer to design and execute lesson plans with the guidance of program coordinators like Jameela.  Since many PE programs are held weekly, the students involved become part of something larger, building lasting relationships with the program coordinators and scientists.

Perhaps because of her own experiences as a student, Jameela was very interested in how students’ after-school time complimented their time in the classroom, and understood the potential of afterschool programs like PE:  “The power of this format, with the scientists coming to give personalized lessons to the students after school, is that the lessons can be more hands-on and in-depth.  In addition, the lessons are informal, and once a scientist starts sharing about her personal challenges and triumphs, the students can see that this scientist is a real person, and that they could someday follow that same path.  The scientists can also learn about the students, and this turns the tables as if to say to the students ‘you’re just as interesting as I am.’”

Jameela began as the Girls’ Programs Coordinator and was promoted to Manager of Girls’ Programs after two years.  She and PE co-founder Gabrielle Lyon recently published an article about their work in the June 2010 issue of Afterschool Matters.

After three and a half years with PE, Jameela will be doing some scientific research of her own.  The seeds planted during her time in Syria have grown into a Fulbright fellowship to perform a case study on the teaching practices of a female science teacher in urban Damascus.  The study will address why science is important to Syrians culturally and socially, and what factors affect teaching practices in science.  “I’m interested in a cross-cultural understanding of how science is taught to youth, but I don’t think ultimately that we’re all that different.   I predict that many of the same factors that influence teaching and learning in the United States, such as race, gender, and economic status, will also influence teaching and learning in Syria,” says Jameela of her study.

I nominated Jameela for AWIS Scientist of the Month because she has been such a role model to me, and has inspired and encouraged me to become involved in my community and reach out to young women in the Chicago area.  Some of my first teaching experiences were through the PE programs, and she helped me expand my definition of a ‘scientist’ to see that there isn’t much separating me from a seventh-grade girl from the Chicago urban area; we both have a curiosity for the world around us, and we want to learn more about it.  We wish Jameela the best of luck during her time in Syria and beyond.

Learn more about Project Exploration.

To read the Jameela’s June 2010 article published in Afterschool Matters click here.

Nomination and article submitted by AWIS Chicago Staff Writer Heather King.  Ms. King is a PhD candidate at the University of Chicago.

*Know a scientist you think should be featured in an upcoming “Scientist of the Month” article?  Send nominations to Jessica Reimer.  Your nominee does not need to be an AWIS member or a woman, but should promote the advancement of women in science, technology, mathematics and engineering.

Want to keep yourself up-to-date on AWIS Chicago activities? Follow AWIS Chicago on Twitter! You can request to be added to our listserve by clicking here, and join the AWIS Chicago group on LinkedIn and Facebook by clicking the icons on the bottom right of this page.

July 2010 Scientist of the Month: Debby Quock, M.S.

by Eunji Chung

Debby Quock, M.S. is a Computer Scientist at Argonne National Laboratory (ANL).  Her work focuses on applications that support real-time accelerator controls, specifically geared particle accelerator controls and software. In addition, at ANL, Debby spear-headed “Introduce a Girl to Engineering Day (IGED)”, a student outreach event for girls in middle school. Before Argonne, Debby was a Senior Chemical Engineer for Texaco, Inc. and a consultant for Technology Evaluations, Inc. Naturally inclined towards scientific reasoning, mathematical interpretation, and analytical problem-solving from a young age, she pursued her B.S. in chemical engineering at the University of Missouri-Columbia, followed by her first M.S. degrees in chemical engineering at Rice University, and a second M.S. degree in computer science at the University of Chicago. During her studies in the late 1970’s, the U.S. was experiencing  an oil shortage and energy crisis and Debby felt the urgency and the significance of pursuing a degree that would apply all of the basic sciences in order to solve real world problems (a problem that is still relevant today). Debby was a Senior Engineer at Texaco, Inc. in the Alternative Energy group and worked on improving oil refinery. Debby attributes both her professional and personal success to her family’s support and dedication to education, starting with her father, who designed the first periscope used in space for NASA and her late mother who pursued both a masters in English and an MBA during a time when it was unheard of for women to obtain an MBA in a male-dominated business culture. In addition, she speaks of the fullness and adventures of love, marriage, and children, and gives a bit of her insight in regards to current oil spills.

EJC: How did you get interested in science?

DQ: My father had a B.S. degree in Physics and a M.S. degree in aeronautical engineering. He designed for NASA and he typically explained events in life through the eyes of a scientist/engineer to my brother, sister and me. My father’s natural curiosity about how things work and how to design new, better solutions was contagious, [and] my choice to pursue science was never really a conscious decision, but rather just always out there as the pastime that I enjoy most and wanted to be a large part of my life.

EJC: How did you end up at Argonne?

DQ: I quit Texaco Inc. in Houston, Texas at the level/title “Senior Chemical Engineer” to stay home full-time with my daughter (quit work when she was 11 months old). From there, I followed my husband and his career from Texas to upstate New York to the suburbs of Chicago. After moving to the suburbs of Chicago, I became antsy to get back into the workforce as I tremendously missed solving technical problems. I worked part-time for one school year as a substitute teacher in the St. Charles, IL school district where I taught everything from P.E. to advanced placement high school physics. It was desirable to have my summers off to be with my children, but I learned while teaching high school physics, that I would rather be “doing” the physics than teaching it to others.

EJC: Were there any professional or personal obstacles you encountered while pursuing your career as a woman in science?

DQ: Yes, many.  Having children threw me for a curve as I never really thought that I would ever get married, much less have children. I was the type that was completely consumed and satisfied by my interests in science and engineering. I met my husband, Joe Quock, at Texaco Inc., we were in the same group that I was first hired into. He has B.S. and M.S. degrees in chemical engineering and currently works for UOP in Des Plaines, IL as a project manager for designing oil refineries.  Now, I can’t imagine having a better soul mate and father to our children – he is completely supportive of my career and also, extremely supportive of our children’s interests in pursuing careers in engineering /science. My daughter has a B.S. degree in chemical engineering and is currently working on her Ph.D. degree in Chemical Engineering. My son is currently working on his B.S. degree in mechanical engineering. While I worked on getting my second masters degree at night school at the University of Chicago while working at Argonne full-time, my husband took over the basic care needs of our children – scheduling dentist and doctor appointments, etc. (all while he was a project manager for UOP meeting the high demands of that job). Even with the tremendous support from my husband as a great father, I did make the very difficult choice of quitting my job at Texaco Inc. to stay home full-time. At that time in history of the oil industry (1980’s), it was expected for engineers to work more than 40 hours per week. I often went in to work on Saturdays, and brought work home on weekdays. After my daughter was born, I asked Texaco if I could switch to working 20 hours per week and was turned down – this was a new concept to the engineering community in the 1980’s, that women would want to work part-time after having children, and on highly challenging technical projects. I ended up staying home full-time for 7 years, but stayed very active in adult projects and activities through volunteer work and going to night school taking business and computer science courses.

EJC: If there was one thing you would advise young scientists, what would it be?

DQ: Join and get involved with professional organizations that are related to your field of work. This will allow you to network, make new friends with those who have similar interests, and serve on committees whose work ultimately gives back to society.

EJC: In the next ten years, what do you envision for yourself? What do you want to achieve?

DQ: I want to continue to be challenged technically and to be able to apply my analytical skills to the highest level possible. I find a tremendous amount of satisfaction in mentoring others and helping them grow as scientists/engineers. At ANL, I have had the pleasure and opportunity to manage and lead projects that include physicists, engineers, computer scientists and college students working part-time or as summer interns. I want to achieve helping others reach their career goals and help to groom the next generation of scientists/engineers.

EJC: The U.S. has a major oil spill to clean up today. From your experience, could you give us your professional observation on the importance of taking precautionary measures?

DQ: As engineers and scientists, we can continuously push ourselves to research and design facilities that exceed and are beyond the current “best practices” of our fields. Not for the sake of producing more profits, or in the case of government operated particle accelerators, delivering more “beam time”, but for the sake of safety of personnel and equipment. At Argonne, incorporating safety into everything that we do has become a major initiative from the lab director on down. The message of Argonne being a safety-focused work culture is exhibited by posters on the topic of safety displayed throughout all buildings, many safety training courses, detailed and thorough validation and trouble-shooting procedures for critical safety systems, periodic lectures to staff by safety experts, and more. Argonne handles a wide variety of dangerous chemicals, radiation, electrical systems and more; so incorporating the mindset of safety first as design engineers and research scientists is crucial. It (safety) has become a way of life at Argonne.

Nomination submitted by Eleanor Taylor of Argonne National Laboratory.   Article by AWIS Chicago Staff Writer Eunji Chung.  Ms. Chung is a PhD candidate at Northwestern University. Her current research involves the use of biodegradable materials and mesenchymal stem cells for orthopaedic applications. Although her plans after graduation are not solidified, she is interested in careers in academia, patent law, and entrepreneurship.

“Introduce A Girl to Engineering Day” is an annual event begun February 21, 2002 to connect middle school aged girls with positive role models of women engineers. Research indicates that girls lose interest in subjects leading into engineering careers long before college and demonstrates a need to introduce and encourage young girls to the engineering profession through job shadowing is essential. To learn more about “Introduce A Girl to Engineering Day”, please click here to read article published in the Chicago Sun Times.

*Know a scientist you think should be featured in an upcoming “Scientist of the Month” article?  Send nominations to Jessica Reimer.  Your nominee does not need to be an AWIS member or a woman, but should promote the advancement of women in science, technology, mathematics and engineering.

Want to keep yourself up-to-date on AWIS Chicago activities? Follow AWIS Chicago on Twitter! You can request to be added to our listserve by clicking here, and join the AWIS Chicago group on LinkedIn and Facebook by clicking the icons on the bottom right of this page.

June 2010 Scientist of the Month: Karen Visick, Ph.D.

by Michelle Merrigan

Typically, passing around a bacterium and its host would not necessarily impress an audience.  But to the delight of crowds, Dr. Karen Visick and members of her laboratory at Loyola University have livened up department research meetings and classes by bringing in specimens of glowing bacteria and tiny hatchling squid to pass around. Karen’s laboratory, in the Microbiology and Immunology Department at the Stritch School of Medicine, studies the fascinating symbiotic relationship between the marine bacterium Vibrio fischeri and the Hawaiian Bobtail Squid, Euprymna scolopes. V. fischeri cells are bioluminescent, and when grown to high density inside a particular organ in the squid, they emit light. This light keeps the squid from casting a shadow beneath it in the water column, which helps it avoid predators. When choosing her laboratory’s research focus, Karen was attracted to the V. fischeri-E. scolopes relationship because unlike many other bacteria-host model systems, the interaction was natural. Bacteria in the seawater associate with the squid without any manipulation.

Karen earned her Ph.D. at the University of Washington studying gene regulation, in particular flagellar assembly in Salmonella. Karen has been a professor at Loyola for 12 years and is taking her first sabbatical this coming fall. During her sabbatical, she will be studying pathogenic members of the Vibrio genus with Dr. Jorge Crosa at Oregon Health and Science University in Portland, Oregon. . She hopes to learn more about biochemical approaches to studying pathogenesis and share the genetic manipulation tools she has developed with her colleagues.

Karen’s husband, Dr. Jonathan Visick, is also a microbiologist and teaches at North Central College in Naperville.  They have been fortunate enough to manage joint sabbaticals in Portland. Jon was offered a faculty development position at Lewis and Clark University and Karen was then able to arrange her own sabbatical. Their nine year-old daughter, Rachel, is also excited to live in a new city for a few months.

Karen expertly balances the many duties of an Associate Professor, including research and teaching, and spending time with her family. She credits her husband’s flexibility and willingness to share childcare duties as part of her ability to meet the demands of academic life. Karen says that while the notion of quality time may have become a cliché, it has been key to managing being a professor and a mother. For example, she sets aside Monday as the day of the week when she leaves the lab early and has a special Mother-Daughter night with Rachel.

Karen is also the director of the Microbiology and Immunology Department’s Graduate Program, which involves managing the needs of current students. She enjoys this position and has no desire to pass it on to another faculty member, even after 6 years. As a student in the department, I can personally attest to her skill in and dedication to this time-consuming job, which has definitely made a positive impact on students.

Nomination and article submitted by AWIS Chicago Staff Writer Michelle Merrigan.  Ms. Merrigan is a PhD candidate in the Microbiology and Immunology Department at Loyola University Chicago’s Stritch School of Medicine. Her research focuses on the pathogenesis of the bacterium Clostridium difficile. After graduation, she hopes to pursue a career in scientific writing or communications.

*Know a scientist you think should be featured in an upcoming “Scientist of the Month” article?  Send nominations to Jessica Reimer.  Your nominee does not need to be an AWIS member or a woman, but should promote the advancement of women in science, technology, mathematics and engineering.

Want to keep yourself up-to-date on AWIS Chicago activities? Follow AWIS Chicago on Twitter! You can request to be added to our listserve by clicking here, and join the AWIS Chicago group on LinkedIn and Facebook by clicking the icons on the bottom right of this page.

May 2010 Scientist of the Month: Sara Branco

by Heather King

“I can’t remember when I decided to become a biologist,” Sara Branco tells me, “I guess biology chose me, since I never considered pursuing any other route.”  Sara is a mycologist at the Field Museum of Natural History and the University of Chicago and is weeks away from receiving her PhD.

Sara began her career in her home country of Portugal, where she fell in love with fungi at 16 after a field trip.  “Soon I realized that in my country there were very few mycologists, and that even fewer studied fungal ecology and evolution.”  Sara wanted to study just that, and after earning her bachelor’s degree, went on to work for the Montesinho Natural Park as a mycologist for three years.  She loved the work so much that she stayed on even when bureaucracy prevented her from receiving a paycheck for over a year.

After her stint at Montesinho, she earned a Fullbright scholarship to study in the United States and began her graduate work in the University of Chicago’s Committee on Evolutionary Biology.  Much of her time is spent at the Field Museum of Natural History interacting with a broad diversity of scientists from mycologists to systematists.

Sara’s research focuses on the symbiosis between fungi and plants that live in soils with extremely high levels of heavy metals.  She often uses her research as a topic during outreach activities and says that adapting her research for outreach with fifth-graders, high school students, teachers, and college students is not only rewarding, but has helped her immensely with clarifying her own ideas.

Sara’s motivation, both personal and professional, was partly inspired by Catarina Costa, her high school math teacher.  “Catarina played a very important role in making me realize that the sky is the limit and that you just have to be focused and work hard to achieve your goals,” Sara says.  “Interacting with and learning from her was definitely important in defining my personal goals and overcoming barriers.”

Sara is a gifted teacher herself and always shows an infectious enthusiasm for science.  I nominated Sara for Scientist of the Month after TAing an undergraduate Biological Diversity course with her at the University of Chicago.  Her passion for reaching each student was impressive, as was her willingness to challenge the effectiveness and accuracy of the existing curriculum.  Sara herself is an example of how much a teacher can affect the lives of her students, and she is passing that influence on.

Sara is pursuing an academic career, where she can both investigate and teach.  “The idea of teaching both in a classroom and my own lab seems like a very fulfilling route,” Sara says.  We wish her luck in all future endeavors!

Nomination and article submitted by AWIS Chicago Staff Writer Heather King. Ms. King is a PhD candidate at University of Chicago.  Photograph courtesy of Maria Alice Neves.

*Know a scientist you think should be featured in an upcoming “Scientist of the Month” article?  Send nominations to Jessica Reimer.  Your nominee does not need to be an AWIS member or a woman, but should promote the advancement of women in science, technology, mathematics and engineering.

Want to keep yourself up-to-date on AWIS Chicago activities? Follow AWIS Chicago on Twitter! You can request to be added to our listserve by clicking here, and join the AWIS Chicago group on LinkedIn and Facebook by clicking the icons on the bottom right of this page.

April 2010 Scientist of the Month: Guillermo Antonio Ameer, ScD

by Eunji Chung

Dr. Guillermo Antonio Ameer is an Associate Professor of Biomedical Engineering and Surgery at Northwestern University. His research focuses on tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, and current research topics range from developing biodegradable materials for bone and anterior cruciate ligament replacements to understanding mechanisms of nitric oxide delivery for cardiovascular applications. He has contributed over 100 peer-reviewed journal publications and conference abstracts, book chapters, and has several patents issued and pending. In addition, he is also an entrepreneur and founder of two biotech companies. Originally from Panama, Guillermo moved to the United States in 1988, where he attended a community college before transferring to the University of Texas, Austin. He then moved on to MIT where he developed an interest in regenerative medicine in the department of Chemical Engineering.  Guillermo received his doctoral degree through the laboratory of Dr. Robert Langer.

Today the Langer laboratory is a first-class juggernaut with over 100 members at any given time. It wasn’t as big during Guillermo’s studies, closer to 35 members. When asked how he chose his lab, he explained that having an open mind was crucial to his fortuitous meeting with Dr. Langer. This open-mindedness became a theme in pivotal decision-making moments and a quality that gave him strength to steer his career.

In graduate school Guillermo worked closely with a subgroup within the lab, which became a source of great support for his future research success. After graduating, he took a joint postdoctoral fellowship at Harvard University in the laboratories of Hidde Ploegh and William Harmon. Guillermo was also open to other scientific careers, such as patent law or consulting, but wasn’t ready to part with research entirely. Developing novel ideas in science and technology within an academic career was a great way to reaffirm his research direction and interests, and he found this challenge exciting.

Guillermo’s passion for science as a young faculty member is evident. Always full of novel and potentially impactful ideas, he worked with experts in a variety of fields to hone in on the right scientific focus for developing early grant applications. He was successful, and advises young scientists today to: “pursue high impact projects with team members with the right expertise. Find where the deficit in the field is and address it.” Looking back, he realized that those original collaborations helped establish his name in the field while his conviction to his research allowed him to actualize his scientific vision. Although today Guillermo has already established himself in his field, he continues to pursue the next set of goals. “In the next ten years, we hope to have the EPC (endothelial progenitor cell) project in clinical trials -to see if it is useful for patients. We also want to know if polymer-based technology will be impactful in patients.”

In addition, Guillermo has been involved in entrepreneurial pursuits since 2007. He acts as President and Chief Scientific Officer for ProSorp BioTech, Inc. and as manager and Chief Scientific Officer for VesselTech BioMedical, LLC. When asked how he knew it was the right time to start a company, Guillermo replied, “You never know.” Development of products through the academic pipeline can be time consuming, so Guillermo started his own business ventures. Being an entrepreneur, he says he learned not only what his peers thought of his work, but also how the world viewed his work. Although it might seem like academia and starting a company are different worlds, he adds, “It’s like interdisciplinary research. Just another collaboration.”

Although quite busy with his scientific endeavors, Guillermo plays basketball, watches films, and enjoys eating various cuisines in his down time. He tries to minimize stress levels because of the negative impact it can have on one’s health. He understands that although his attention must be given to specific demands, stressing over it will not benefit the situation. Guillermo attends to demands such as financial deadlines for his business ventures, or preparation as an instructor for an upcoming class, or personal plans within his relationship as they emerge.

Guillermo’s ambitions and open-mindedness to ideas and discussions both in and out of science has been one of the best experiences I have had as a graduate student in his lab. He trusts the expertise his people demonstrate in the lab regardless of their seniority, and through this type of respect, fosters taking ownership of their knowledge and project. I’ve learned a lot myself by witnessing his collaborative nature which attracts good people and ideas. His trust in his own decisions and direction instills confidence in his work as a scientist as well as an individual. He has guided my career by introducing me to the right people to help me gain a better understanding of various scientific and medical principles that push my project forward and keep it on track. Through directing me when needed but giving me the freedom to formulate and assert my own ideas, I have grown as a woman in science both through my ability to think independently as well as work collaboratively, and for that, I will always be thankful.

Nomination and article submitted by AWIS Chicago Staff Writer Eunji Chung.  Ms. Chung is a PhD candidate at Northwestern University in Dr. Ameer’s laboratory.  Her current research involves the use of biodegradable materials and mesenchymal stem cells for orthopaedic applications. Although her plans after graduation are not solidified, she is interested in careers in academia, patent law, and entrepreneurship.

*Know a scientist you think should be featured in an upcoming “Scientist of the Month” article?  Send nominations to Jessica Reimer.  Your nominee does not need to be an AWIS member or a woman, but should promote the advancement of women in science, technology, mathematics and engineering.

Want to keep yourself up-to-date on AWIS Chicago activities? Follow AWIS Chicago on Twitter! You can request to be added to our listserve by clicking here, and join the AWIS Chicago group on LinkedIn and Facebook by clicking the icons on the bottom right of this page.

March 2010 Scientist of the Month: Nicole Neubarth

by Heather King

Nicole Neubarth, a third year undergraduate at the University of Chicago, has a lot on her plate.  She works part time in Dr. Melina Hale’s lab as an undergraduate research assistant.  She also takes a full load of biology and core curriculum courses, volunteers for the university’s film society, and is a fellow in the Computational NeuroscienceResearch Training Program, funded by the National Institute of Drug Abuse at NIH.  Despite the time she spends on these activities, she maintains her enthusiasm for biology and research.

“My interest in biology came from my fascination with animals,” Nicole says.  “There wasn’t a particular moment that I became interested in biology, it was just what came naturally to me.”  Nicole, like many future biologists, spent her childhood catching insects and fish in containers to see what they would eat and where they would hide.  As a high school student, she became interested in neuroscience by reading popular science articles and, in particular, an article about the evolution of morality in primates caught her eye.  She saw neuroscience as the study of the ‘black boxes’ between the brain and a behavior, and wanted to understand their components.  “To study these inner components would be like going back in time,” explains Nicole, “or even understanding what it’s like to be another organism, or having a better understanding of my fellow humans.”

Primate researched piqued her interest, but Nicole chose to work with Dr. Melina Hale studying locomotion in fish.  While moral behavior was very interesting to Nicole, she realized that such complex behaviors were challenging to quantify. Locomotion in fish is a much simpler system, and provides the opportunity to make direct connections between a particular behavior and its corresponding neuron or neurological pathway.  Her current project, with Dr. Hale and collaborators George Lauder at Harvard University and James Tangorra at Drexel University, is aimed at understanding the mechanism fish use to sense changes in the surrounding environment.  The group hopes to gain insight into the neurological pathways in the pectoral fins used to send information to the brain about the turbulence of the water, and the pathways the brain uses to respond and give instructions to the fins on how to respond to the turbulence.  Using this information, they hope to build an autonomous swimming robot with the ability to correct for irregularities in the surrounding fluid.

Working in Dr. Hale’s lab also inspires Nicole as a female scientist.  “Not only is Melina a respected scientist, she also has a family.  I admire her ability to perform two very difficult jobs at once.”  Nicole plans to earn a faculty position at a university, where she can continue to contribute to the field of neuroscience.  We wish Nicole the best of luck in the pursuit of her goals!

Nomination and article submitted by AWIS Chicago Staff Writer Heather King.  Ms. King is a PhD candidate at University of Chicago.  Photograph courtesy of Yen-Chyi Liu.

*Know a scientist you think should be featured in an upcoming “Scientist of the Month” article?  Send nominations to Jessica Reimer.  Your nominee does not need to be an AWIS member or a woman, but should promote the advancement of women in science, technology, mathematics and engineering.

Want to keep yourself up-to-date on AWIS Chicago activities? Follow AWIS Chicago on Twitter! You can request to be added to our listserve by clicking here, and join the AWIS Chicago group on LinkedIn and Facebook by clicking the icons on the bottom right of this page.

February 2010 Scientist of the Month: Katherine L. Knight, Ph.D.

by Michelle Merrigan

Dr. Katherine Knight is an immunologist and recently celebrated her 20th anniversary as chair of the department of Microbiology and Immunology at the Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine. To celebrate this anniversary, alumni and colleagues returned to Loyola for a symposium to share their recollections of Dr. Knight and her role in their development as scientists. The theme was “20 Years of Doing It Together”, which is appropriate because Dr. Knight has always emphasized that science is about relationships. “Everyone is a mentor to somebody,” she says.

The mentoring relationship between faculty members and students is at the core of the department’s educational focus. As chair, Dr. Knight has put in place programs that help students recognize and develop positive mentoring relationships. For example, at the annual department retreat, new students participate in discussions about choosing a graduate advisor. Dr. Knight advises students to choose someone that they are going to enjoy interacting with personally. She points out that everyone has different needs. “Some PI’s are more directive, and some students need more direction than others.” Ideally, a mentor should be able to respond to whatever the student requires. She suggests students choose based on the environment of the laboratory, not necessarily on the project.

Dr. Knight holds regular informal meetings to discuss any issues students choose, which can range from how to find a post-doctoral fellowship to tips on making effective PowerPoint slides for lectures. Indeed, the department has a strong focus on communication skills, which Dr. Knight feels are the most important skills to acquire outside of designing a sound experiment. All first year students participate in a special course dedicated to learning speaking and presentation skills. This gives all students a core competency on which they and their graduate advisors can build. She emphasizes always adapting your talk to your audience, and maintaining a “teaching frame of mind.”

Dr Knight has shared her philosophy of mentoring with the department on multiple occasions. She particularly emphasizes that a good mentor sees what the student/mentee needs, rather than his or her own needs as an advisor. She admits that in the current academic climate, mentors have their own pressures to publish and be productive, and yet at the same time must allow the student time to develop his or her own scientific mind. She advises new faculty on balancing the personal motives of productivity and the care-giving motives involved in mentoring students. She insists that these motives need not be mutually exclusive. “There’s a study that shows that for people who have been well-mentored, their institutions are much better off because those people stay.” Dr. Knight also prepares senior students for the transition to being mentors themselves, saying, “If you’ve been treated well, you will subsequently treat other people well.”

On January 22, 2010, Dr. Knight gave a presentation on mentoring at the annual meeting of the Association of Medical School Microbiology and Immunology Chairs.  Not only did this event occur during National Mentoring Month, but also the day on which she gave the talk was “Thank Your Mentor Day”.  At the symposium in May 2009, a group of colleagues, alumni and students established the Katherine L. Knight Fund for Mentoring in honor of her guidance and mentorship. In keeping with her philosophy of adapting to whatever the mentee needs, this fund will be used to enhance the mentoring experience for students, whatever form that might require, such as student travel or professional development programs.

Nomination and article submitted by AWIS Chicago Staff Writer Michelle Merrigan.  Ms. Merrigan is a PhD candidate in the Microbiology and Immunology Department at Loyola University Chicago’s Stritch School of Medicine. Her research focuses on the pathogenesis of the bacterium Clostridium difficile. After graduation, she hopes to pursue a career in scientific writing or communications.

*Know a scientist you think should be featured in an upcoming “Scientist of the Month” article?  Send nominations to Jessica Reimer.  Your nominee does not need to be an AWIS member or a woman, but should promote the advancement of women in science, technology, mathematics and engineering.

Want to keep yourself up-to-date on AWIS Chicago activities? Follow AWIS Chicago on Twitter! You can request to be added to our listserve by clicking here, and join the AWIS Chicago group on LinkedIn and Facebook by clicking the icons on the bottom right of this page.